How the Toolkit compares

Against the three kinds of thing people use instead. Honest, including where they win.

	The Toolkit	Public screening sites	Measurement-based-care platforms	Worksheet libraries
Examples	This site	Mental Health America Screening	Greenspace, Blueprint, Mirah, Owl, Theracharts, Quenza	Therapist Aid, Psychology Tools, PositivePsychology.com
Free for the person using it	Yes	Yes	Usually through a clinician’s subscription	Partly; paid tiers for professionals
Account required	No; one code per person	No; anonymous	Yes	For professionals
Remembers you and charts change	Yes	No	Yes	No
Hands results to a therapist who has never seen the site	Yes, by link	No; you print a result	No; the clinician signs up first	No
Values and ACT exercises, interactive	Yes	No	Some, as forms	As PDFs
Validated questionnaire library	12	About a dozen	From about 20 to 600+	Some, as printable forms
Written report from your answers	Yes, AI-written and labeled as such	No	No	No
HIPAA business associate agreement	No; consumer tool	No; anonymous	Yes	Varies
EHR integration and caseload analytics	No	No	Yes	No
Outcome evidence for the product itself	None yet; see the research page	Large screening datasets	Vendor case studies; some peer-reviewed	None

If you are a clinic that bills for measurement-based care or needs a BAA and an EHR feed, use one of the platforms; they do that well. If you want anonymous one-off screens, Mental Health America is excellent. If you want printable worksheets, the libraries are deep. The Toolkit is for the person who found a tool on their own and might bring it to someone, and for the therapist on the receiving end of that link.

Reviewed by Michael RoBards, LCSW · September 2026